What does Stegald v. US prevent regarding police searches?

Stegald v. US establishes important legal principles regarding the limitations on police authority when it comes to searching for individuals named in arrest warrants. The correct answer reflects that the ruling prevents law enforcement from entering a third party's residence to search for a suspect listed in an arrest warrant unless they possess a separate search warrant for that specific location. This principle is rooted in the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.

In this case, the court emphasized the need to respect the privacy rights of individuals who are not connected to the warrant, underlining the separate legal protections that extend to the premises of third parties. This sets a clear boundary for police operations, requiring them to obtain the appropriate legal permissions if they intend to conduct searches beyond the individual directly involved in the warrant.

Other options present interpretations that fall short of recognizing the specific limitations imposed by Stegald v. US. For example, asserting that police can search any premises simply because a warrant exists ignores the requirement for a search warrant when entering third-party homes. Moreover, suggesting that searching without consent is always forbidden does not acknowledge the nuances of legal protocols that allow searches under certain conditions. Lastly, the indication that no prior consent is needed during an arrest does not take into account the necessity