Which exception to a warrantless search is established in the case of Terry v. Ohio?

The correct choice is the Terry frisk, which refers to the legal standard established by the Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio. This landmark ruling recognized that a police officer may stop and briefly detain a person for investigative purposes if they have a reasonable suspicion that the individual is involved in criminal activity. Along with this stop, officers are allowed to conduct a limited search, or "frisk," of the person for weapons if they have a reasonable belief that the person may be armed and dangerous.

This decision is significant because it provides law enforcement with a vital tool to ensure their safety and the safety of the public during police encounters. The Terry frisk is distinct from other exceptions to warrantless searches, as it specifically addresses the balance between individual rights and the need for police to protect themselves when they encounter potentially dangerous situations. It is not a full search but rather a limited and protective measure based on reasonable suspicion.

In relation to the other concepts mentioned, seizure pertains to taking control of a person or property but does not encompass the specific criteria for a protective frisk. A search incident to arrest allows for searches after making an arrest but does not apply in situations without an arrest. Exigent circumstances allow for immediate law enforcement action to prevent evidence destruction or protect